Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 14:30

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Where to Watch Le Mans Live Stream 24-Hour Race Online for Free From Anywhere - Business Insider
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thunder -750 favorites in NBA Finals over Pacers - ESPN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why are people calling the Biden/Harris administration a disaster for the US economy?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Mundfish Reveals The Cube, An MMORPG Shooter Set In The Atomic Heart Universe - Game Informer
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Bitcoin in ‘make or break’ zone – Trump Media hints at what’s next - AMBCrypto